This plan aligns with and was adapted from the overall
EDUHSD Technology Plan created by the District Technology Committee.
District Research-based Approach:
A
research-based process for the development of curriculum and staff training
programs is in place in the
Expected student outcomes in
three to five years as a result of technology use:
Students will be able to…
·
Use technology as a tool for learning, such as
data collection outside of the classroom, doing directed searches on the
Internet, and accessing electronic databases.
·
Use technology to demonstrate critical thinking
and problem solving skills to analyze, evaluate, and report findings.
·
Use technology to show evidence of achievement,
via multimedia presentations, web pages, and other integrated applications.
· Possess technological skills appropriate for higher education or the work place
·
Access learning resources at school through
extended lab hours, and from home via electronic communication.
§
Word processing
§
Spreadsheets
§ Databases
§ Internet Research
§
Presentation Software
§
File storage
§ Basic Technology Vocabulary
§
Ethical Use of
Technology
EDUHSD
teachers and staff will provide the necessary instruction and support to
achieve the following:
Expected staff outcomes in
three to five years as a result of technology use:
Staff
will be able to…
·
Facilitate learning, working less as presenters
of information and more as guides for students.
·
Share resources electronically among colleagues.
·
Use computer technology to explore, evaluate,
access, and integrate computer technology-based materials and instruction into
the curriculum for their subject areas.
·
Access primary source documents.
The
·
By June 2005, 65% of teachers
will incorporate software supplied by vendor of the adopted textbook, or other
appropriate supplemental software, into courses that utilize mathematical
skills in order to improve basic mathematical proficiency.
·
By June of 2006, 90% of teachers will reach a
proficient level of competency in a majority of the areas addressed by CTAP i-assessment
·
By June of 2006, 75% core subject/classroom
teachers will learn the tools necessary to integrate appropriate software and
technology into the reading, writing, and /or
mathematics foci.
· By June of 2006, 85% of classroom teachers will be trained on how to use AERIES/ABI to take daily attendance on-line.
· By June of 2006, 95% of teachers will be able to track students’ grades, assignments, and progress using an electronic grade book.
·
By June of 2006, 95%
of Special Education teachers will be able to create student Individual
Education Plans (IEP) and track the students’ progress using an electronic data
based program.
· By June of 2006, 100% of teachers will use ABI to record daily attendance, progress and quarterly grades.
· By June of 2006, 60% of teachers will have access to ABI from home.
· By June of 2006, 100% of staff will use email on a daily basis to communicate with other staff and parents.
·
By June of 2006, 50% of teachers will have
created web pages accessible from their school site and department website.
·
By June of 2005, all core subject areas and
Computer Technology 1 course competencies will be tracked through Aeries for
all students.
Expected technology outcomes in the next three to five
years for infrastructure, hardware, tech support and software:
·
Incorporate
software appropriate to student achievement
The District’s infrastructure will be upgraded to meet the
growing needs and demands of current and future technology resources at Oak
Ridge HS. Infrastructure that allows
teachers, students and staff to maintain fast, easily accessible connections
will be available. Computer-to-student
ratios will be improved and teachers will have the tools they need to integrate
technology into every aspect of the curriculum
Expected
funding/budget outcomes in 3 years:
The successful integration of
technology within the district is a long range funding priority for the
Expected monitoring and assessment outcomes within three
to five years:
Technology
Coordinators, along with the Technology Committee at Oak Ridge, will monitor
and assess the activities in the respective plans and will determine if any
modifications or adjustments are need to be made to accomplish the goals. The evaluation of the plan will take place on
a quarterly basis at the Administrative Technology Committee meetings. The committee will examine the scores in the
various subsections of the STAR as required to assess for improvement in scores
over the base year. Staff at
Technology Coordinator will collect
data on the number of students who successfully complete the Computer Technology
1 course of study. The Coordinator will
also analyze the percentage of students who successfully challenge the course
and will assess the effectiveness of that test.
Expected research based methods and
strategy outcomes in 3 years:
In line with the District goals,
§
All curriculum
areas will implement a standards-based approach to instruction
§
All curriculum
areas will develop benchmark projects/assessments to provide data on student
achievement of the standards
§
All curriculum
areas will continue to review research to determine the best possible
approaches to instruction
Technology provides teachers and
students with effective productivity tools and extensive resources to increase
learning in the classroom. At
As teachers increase their
proficiency levels, they begin to weave technology into the content areas. At
Data from the District Technology Survey:
Description of access to
technology tools for all instructional staff during and outside the school
day:
We
have currently deployed over 350 computers at
Description of access to technology tools for all
students during and outside the school day:
Description of District’s current use of hardware and
software to support teaching and learning:
·
Architectural Design/CAD
·
Business Careers
·
Business Education Technology
·
Communication and TV Broadcasting
· Engineering/Building Trade
|
Department |
Typical Frequency |
Type of Use |
|
English |
1-2 days/week |
·
At least once per
year, the Career Center Technician visits English classes and completes an
online Career Aptitude Inventory and project with students. ·
All English
departments in the district require that students use a word processing
program for various essays and research projects. ·
|
|
Social Science |
1-5 days/week |
·
All World History
courses require that students complete a project and present the project to
the class using PowerPoint. ·
Students are
required to do a research project using
various online research programs (EBSCO, STIRS, Athena, ERIC) |
|
Science |
2-5 days/week |
·
All Physical Science
and Biology students do presentations that are presented using PowerPoint. ·
A career unit is
done in which students must research a science-specific career. ·
GPS and GIS software
is used for measurement projects in Environmental Science and other courses. |
|
Mathematics |
2-5 days/week |
·
Students have access
from home and school to BoxerMath. ·
Teachers are able to
demonstrate using integrated calculator functions. ·
Scientific
calculators with advanced functions are used in all courses. |
|
Visual and Performing Arts |
1-5 days/week |
·
The Technical
Theater Production class uses software that integrates lighting, sound
effects, composes music and edits video. ·
The music department
utilizes music composition software. |
|
Modern Language |
1-5 days/week |
·
PowerPoint
presentations are used. ·
Cultural research is
done online. ·
Classrooms use
language specific keyboards for assignments. |
|
Trades & Industry |
daily |
·
Computer Assisted
Drafting is used in drafting and architecture courses. ·
Computer diagnostic
software is used in the Auto Shop programs. ·
Digital Tools are
used in Woodshop and Metal shop. |
|
PE & Health |
1-2 time/week |
·
Heart monitors are
used to teach about target heart rate in Physical Education. ·
Spreadsheets are
used to track progress in Physical Education courses. ·
Health students do a
major report which requires online research and a summative PowerPoint
presentation. |
|
Special Education |
Daily |
·
All Individualized
Education Plans are created using SELPAWorks. ·
Students use
numerous software support programs, including Skillsutor,
BoxerMath, MathType, etc. |
|
Business & Technology |
Daily |
·
Students daily use
Microsoft Office applications. . ·
Adobe Acrobat and
Macromedia products are used by Web Design, Desktop Publishing and other
students. ·
The TV and Video
Production classes use software to create animation and edit video. |
|
Family and Consumer Sciences |
2-4 days/week |
·
“Baby Think it Over” is used in a variety of FACS courses. ·
Foods and Nutrition
students utilize video presentations, PowerPoint, and online research. |
|
Non-departmental (Yearbook,
Newspaper) |
Daily |
·
PageMaker is used by
the Yearbook staffs. ·
Newspaper students
utilize Microsoft Office applications, PageMaker, and Adobe software. |
|
All Departments |
Ongoing |
·
A number of teachers
require students to submit assignments via email or the school network. ·
A number of teachers
use the School Notes website to post student homework assignments. ·
Teachers have LCD
projectors set up to their computer to display interactive lessons. ·
Teachers and
students use email for class assignments and communication. |
Computers
are used in various ways to support instruction and student learning in all
curricular areas. For example, students
access math practice activities stored on site servers and via the Internet. Students also regularly access web based
language arts activities. Technology is
frequently used by students for both research and presentation activities.
The school’s goal is to deliver
technologically rich instruction in all appropriate areas. All staff who designs, develops, and
implements the
·
Using technology as a learning tool.
·
Matching technology use objectives to the
curriculum content standards and benchmarks in appropriate subject areas.
·
Establishing student technology user skill
standards.
·
Requiring the student to acquire hardware and
software user skills.
·
Integrating the use of technology into the body
of lesson plans.
·
Using teaching strategies that are based on
current learning theory.
·
Requiring the student to solve authentic
problems through project based assignments with technology.
·
Providing an effective library/media technology
resource program to all students and targeted groups.
·
Coordinating activities among teachers who are
integrating technology into the curriculum.
Technology offers students
possibilities for exploration, reinforcement, remediation, and acceleration
across the curriculum. Teachers are
seeking and discovering innovative ways to meet the needs of an increasingly
diverse student population. GATE
students and English Learners, indeed all students, will benefit from increased
access to technology with opportunities to:
·
Engage in a wide variety of multimedia and
telecommunications projects
·
Master curricular objectives
·
Develop real-world computer skills that will
enable them to be more productive when they exit high school.
Technology
is infused into the curriculum in many
classrooms by matching technology use with research and information literacy
skills in appropriate subject areas, as illustrated in the table below.
|
Technology |
Research and
Information Literacy Skills |
|
Word processing, graphics, desktop
publishing |
Synthesis (writing) Use of Information
(note-taking) |
|
Spelling and grammar checking |
Evaluation |
|
Information Retrieval and Search Systems |
Information
Seeking Strategies Location |
|
Spreadsheets, Database management systems |
Synthesis |
|
Presentations, Video Production |
Use
of Information Synthesis |
|
Electronic
resources (on CD-ROM, servers, WWW) |
Information
Seeking Strategies Location |
Goal
1.1: Technology will be integrated
into the curriculum to improve target areas of Language Arts and Mathematics.
Objectives:
1.1.1 75% of teachers
will incorporate software materials supplied by vendor of the adopted
textbooks, or other appropriate supplemental software, into courses that
utilize language skills in order to improve English proficiency.
1.1.2 75% of teachers
will incorporate software, such as BoxerMath, and
materials supplied by vendor of the adopted textbooks, or other appropriate
supplemental software, into courses that utilize mathematical skills in order
to improve basic mathematical proficiency.
Benchmarks:
1.1.1a By June 2004, 55% of
teachers will incorporate software supplied by vendor of the adopted textbooks,
or other appropriate supplemental software, into courses that utilize language
skills in order to improve English proficiency.
1.1.1b By June
2005, 65% of teachers will incorporate software
supplied by vendor of the adopted textbook, or other appropriate supplemental
software, into courses that utilize language skills in order to improve English
proficiency.
1.1.1c By June
2006, 75% of teachers will incorporate software
supplied by vendor of the adopted textbook, or other appropriate supplemental
software, into courses that utilize language skills in order to improve English
proficiency.
1.1.2a By June 2004, 55% of
teachers will incorporate software supplied by vendor of the adopted textbooks,
or other appropriate supplemental software, into courses that utilize
mathematical skills in order to improve basic mathematical proficiency.
1.1.2b By June
2005, 65% of teachers will incorporate software
supplied by vendor of the adopted textbook, or other appropriate supplemental
software, into courses that utilize mathematical skills in order to improve
basic mathematical proficiency.
1.1.2c By June
2006, 75% of teachers will incorporate software
supplied by vendor of the adopted textbook, or other appropriate supplemental
software, into courses that utilize mathematical skills in order to improve
basic mathematical proficiency.
Goal
#
|
Implementation Plan/Activities
|
Responsible Dept. or Position |
Timeline |
Budget Source |
Monitoring and Evaluation
activities |
|
1.1 |
Research
software that supports the adopted Language Arts and Mathematics curriculae. |
Department
Chairs and Curriculum Coordinator |
July 2003 -
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
List compiled of recommended supplemental software. |
|
1.1 |
Evaluate
textbook vendor software. |
Each department |
July 2003 -
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Develop checklist to verify usability and usefulness of
software. |
|
1.1 |
Design and
offer staff development opportunities for the integration of the recommended
software into the appropriate curricular areas. |
Department Chairs
and Curriculum Coordinator |
June 2003 -
June 2006 (ongoing) |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Professional learning catalog and feedback forms. |
|
1.1 |
Develop rubrics
for effective software integration. |
Department
Chairs and Curriculum Coordinator |
June 2004 -
June 2005 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Post and distribute rubrics via the district website and
e-mail. |
|
1.1 |
Assess staff
use of technology and the integration of technology into the curriculum. |
Site Technology
Administrator |
Once per school
year |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
CTAP2 Percentage of technology integration
goal completion. |
|
1.1 |
Gather evidence
of student work demonstrating technology integration. |
Site
Administration |
June 2003 -
June 2006 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Rubric for integration of technology into lessons. |
|
1.1 |
Provide
opportunities for teachers to share student projects. |
Site
Administration |
June 2003 -
June 2006 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Site based staff meetings. |
Sources (See Appendix A):
·
Coley, R., 1997.
·
Geisert, P., Futrell, M., 2000.
·
Means,
B., & Olson, K. 1997.
· Sandholtz, et al, 1997
·
Wested, 2003.
Benefit(s):
Integrating technology into all aspects of
curriculum and teaching provides new avenues for introducing, reinforcing, and
extending student learning. Through
curriculum aligned software students are able to:
Goal 1.2: All
students will demonstrate competency in the eight core technology skill areas,
as supported by a district graduation requirement.
Objective: By June 2004, continuing through subsequent years, all
students will have enrolled in and passed Computer Technology 1, or demonstrate
competency by taking and passing the proficiency exam in the eight core areas.
Benchmarks:
1.2.1
By June of
2003, 90% of incoming students will enroll in Computer Technology 1.
1.2.2 By June of 2004, all graduating seniors will have completed the computer technology competency requirement.
|
Objective # |
Implementation Plan/Activities |
Responsible Dept. or Position |
Timeline |
Budget Source |
Monitoring and Evaluation
activities |
|
1.2.1 |
Inform parents
and students of the Computer Literacy Graduation Requirement, and the options
for meeting the requirement. |
Counselors |
June 2003 |
General Fund |
Computer Technology
1 enrollment data |
|
1.2.1 |
Develop
additional forms of the Computer Application and Literacy Exam |
District
Business Technology Staff |
June 2003 -
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
SILT,
Educational Services |
|
1.2.1 |
Continue to
develop model lessons that scaffold skills for teaching technology skills. |
Site Technology
Administrator and Site Technology Committees |
June 2004 -
June 2005 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
SILT,
Educational Services |
|
1.2.2 |
Collect student
data and individual test scores by site. |
Site Business/Technology
teachers, Counseling Department |
ongoing |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Directors of
Guidance |
Source (See Appendix A):
·
Cradler, 1994
·
Hubbard, 2000
·
ISTE, 2000
·
McKenzie, 1999
Benefits:
To live, learn, and work
successfully in an increasingly complex and information-rich society, students
must be able to use technology effectively.
In an effective educational setting, technology can enable students to
become:
Goal
1.3: Technology will be utilized
to ensure appropriate access for students.
Objective:
1.3.1
Technology resources
(software, specialty equipment) will be incorporated to support the Special
Education, English Learners, GATE, and Title One students as appropriate.
Benchmarks:
1.3.1a By June
of 2004, 55% of students who are members of the identified groups will utilize
technology to enhance their learning.
1.3.1b By June of
2005, 65% of students who are members of the identified groups will utilize
technology to enhance their learning.
1.3.1c By June of
2006, 75% students who are members of the identified groups will utilize
technology to enhance their learning.
Goal
#
|
Implementation Plan/Activities
|
Responsible Dept. or Position |
Timeline |
Budget Source |
Monitoring and Evaluation
activities |
|
1.3 |
Each school
will evaluate the current utilization of technology among the target groups. |
Appropriate
Program Coordinators |
Beginning of
each school year |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Report of current usage |
|
1.3 |
Each school
will develop strategies to increase utilization among members of the target
groups. |
Appropriate Program Coordinators |
Ongoing, yearly |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Plans and strategies will be distributed
to school staff |
|
1.3 |
Compile data on
the group’s use of technology. |
Appropriate Program Coordinators |
End of each
year |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Compare data
yearly |
Source (See Appendix A):
·
Coley, R., 1997.
·
Geisert, P., Futrell, M., 2000.
·
Hubbard, 2000
·
Means,
B., & Olson, K. 1997.
· Sandholtz, et al, 1997
·
WestEd, 2003.
Benefits:
Technology offers students
possibilities for exploration, reinforcement, remediation, and acceleration
across the curriculum. Teachers are
seeking and discovering innovative ways to meet the needs of an increasingly
diverse student population. GATE
students, Title One students, and EL students will benefit from increased
access to technology with opportunities to:
·
Engage in a wide variety of multimedia and
telecommunications projects.
·
Master curricular objectives and meet state
standards.
·
Develop real-world computer skills that will
enable them to be more productive when they exit high school.
Goal 1.4: Utilization
of technology will make student record keeping and assessment more efficient
and supportive of teachers’ efforts to meet each student’s academic needs.
Objectives:
1.4.1
Teachers will take
attendance via AERIES Browser Interface (ABI).
1.4.2
Teachers will track students’
grades, assignments, and progress using an electronic grade book.
1.4.3
Special Education
teachers will be able to create student Individual Education Plans (IEP) and
track the students’ progress using an electronic data based program.
1.4.4
Parents will have
internet access to student attendance, grades, and graduation status.
1.4.5
Teachers will have
access to ABI in order to input grades from home.
Benchmarks:
1.4.1 By June of 2004, 100%
of teachers will be able to take attendance via a secure computer in their
classroom.
1.4.2a By June of 2004, 85%
of teachers will be able to track students’ grades, assignments, and progress
using an electronic grade book.
1.4.2b By June of 2005, 90%
of teachers will be able to track students’ grades, assignments, and progress
using an electronic grade book
1.4.2c By June of 2006, 95%
of teachers will be able to track students’ grades, assignments, and progress
using an electronic grade book.
1.4.3a By June of 2004, 75%
of Special Education teachers will be able to create student Individual
Education Plans (IEP) and track the students’ progress using an electronic data
based program.
1.4.3b By June of 2005, 85%
of Special Education teachers will be able to create student Individual
Education Plans (IEP) and track the students’ progress using an electronic data
based program.
1.4.3c By June of 2006, 95%
of Special Education teachers will be able to create student Individual
Education Plans (IEP) and track the students’ progress using an electronic data
based program.
1.4.4a By June of 2004, 50% of parents will have
access to student data via the Internet.
1.4.4b By June of 2005, 60% of parents will have
access to student data via the Internet.
1.4.4c By June of 2006, 70% of parents will have access to student data via the Internet.
1.4.5a By June of 2004, 30% of teachers will have
access to ABI from home.
1.4.5b By June of 2005, 45% of teachers will have
access to ABI from home.
1.4.5c By June of 2006, 60% of teachers will have
access to ABI from home.
Objective
#
|
Implementation Plan/Activities
|
Responsible Dept. or Position |
Timeline |
Budget Source |
Monitoring and Evaluation
activities |
|
1.4.1 |
Staff Development for the
AERIES Browser Interface |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2004,
ongoing for new staff |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Sign-in sheets
at workshops, monitor ABI use from off-campus |
|
1.4.1 |
Staff Development for
AERIES Users |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2003-2006 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Certificates
from Vendor of training completion |
|
1.4.2 |
Train staff on the use of
electronic grade book programs and processes for uploading grades |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2004,
ongoing |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Staff
attendance at workshops, staff usage of electronic gradebook
programs. |
|
1.4.3 |
SELPAWorks software application will be deployed at the site
level. |
Special
Education Staff |
June 2003 -
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Periodic
testing of the usability, functionality, and data conversion. |
|
1.4.3 |
Train Special Education
staff on new software application |
Special
Education Staff |
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Staff
attendance at workshops |
|
1.4.4 |
Create parent ABI accounts |
Microcomputer
Technicians |
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Monitor and
update account list |
|
1.4.4 |
Train parents on ABI use |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2004,
yearly thereafter |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Workshop
sign-ins |
|
1.4.5 |
Install software to allow
ABI access from outside of firewall |
Microcomputer
Technicians |
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Monitoring of
the usage and security issues by Site Administrators and Microcomputer
Technicians |
Source (See Appendix A):
·
Geisert 2000
·
Hayes,
D., et al 2001
·
McKenzie, 1999
Benefits:
With accurate, up-to-date, and
easily accessible data, those responsible for student learning can provide the
best opportunities for children to learn.
By providing quick and convenient access to data for all, teachers and
administrators at
·
Complete attendance online in the
classroom.
·
Upload grades into the ABI system
·
Access test score histories of their students
very quickly.
·
Access a variety of data they need to improve
their instruction.
·
Better meet the needs of Special Education students
through targeted modifications.
·
Improve student achievement by communicating
accurate and up-to-date information to parents
Goal
1.5: Technology will be utilized
to increase the accessibility of teachers and administrators to parents.
Objective:
1.5.1
All teachers and
administrators will utilize email on a daily basis.
1.5.2
Benchmarks:
1.5.1a By June
of 2003, 100% of
1.5.1b By June of 2004, 90% of staff will use email on a daily basis to communicate with other staff and parents.
1.5.1c By June of 2005, 95% of staff will use email on a daily basis to communicate with other staff and parents.
1.5.1c By June of 2006, 100% of staff will use email
on a daily basis to communicate with other staff and parents.
1.5.2a By June of
2004, 100% of Staff will have websites accessible from the
1.5.2b By June of 2005, 100% of school site departments will have websites accessible from the school sites home page.
1.5.2c By June of 2006, 50% of teachers will have
created web pages accessible from their school site and department website.
Objective
#
|
Implementation Plan/Activities
|
Responsible Dept. or Position |
Timeline |
Budget Source* |
Monitoring and Evaluation
activities |
|
1.5.1 |
Create e-mail
accounts for all District teachers and administrators. |
Microcomputer
Technicians |
June 2003,
ongoing for new staff |
General Fund |
Update e-mail accounts and monitor server for security
issues. |
|
1.5.1 |
Develop
on-going training workshops and seminars for staff on e-mail use. |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2003 -
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Information
compiled by the Profession Learning feedback form and sign-in sheets. |
|
1.5.2 |
Develop
on-going training workshops and seminars for site and department webmasters. |
Site Technology
Administrators |
June 2004 -
June 2005 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Information
compiled by the Profession Learning feedback form and sign-in sheets. |
|
1.5.1 &
1.5.2 |
Continue
trainings on e-mail and web design. |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2005 -
June 2006 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Information
compiled by the Profession Learning feedback form and sign-in sheets. |
|
1.5.2 |
District and/or
appropriate school’s web-site will be able to provide e-mail links to all
designated teachers, administrators, and staff members. |
Appropriate
site or department webmaster |
June 2005 -
June 2006 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Periodic monitoring of links and data. |
|
1.5.2 |
Provide
training sessions for teachers on how to create a webpage, and appropriate
content guidelines. |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2005-June
2006 |
General Fund,
Various Categorical Funds |
Information compiled by the Profession
Learning feedback form and sign-in sheets |
Source (See Appendix A):
·
Cradler, 2002
·
Geisert, 2000
·
McKenzie, 1999
·
Office of Technology Assessment, 1995
Benefits:
When parents become actively involved in their children’s education,
students are more likely to reach their potential. Communication between parents and the
appropriate school personnel is a key component in getting parents more
involved.
Today e-mail is becoming one of the most
common forms of communication. E-mail
allows parents to:
E-mail allows teachers and administrators to:
Updated site and district websites will give parents easy
access to a wide variety of information that will help them support their
children’s education.
Staff
development is one of the most important pieces to the successful implementation
of a technology plan. Oak Ridge HS
recognizes the need for every student to be technologically literate in order
to thrive in an information-based society and economy. A key to ensuring a quality education for all
students in the area of technology is to provide all teachers and staff
with introductory and on-going staff development in technology.
A central
goal of the school is to ensure that all teachers and staff meet a minimal
level of proficiency with common hardware and software applications– and to
support their endeavors to reach advanced levels. Staff development training and support must be
structured to meet the needs of newly hired teachers and staff as well as
experienced teachers and staff. It must
also be structured in a hierarchical sequence so that teachers can progress and
become highly proficient users of computer-based technology with the skills and
knowledge to help students become lifelong learners. It also must be aligned
with state requirements for ongoing professional learning. A comprehensive staff development plan is
essential to:
Oak Ridge HS recognizes the need to
evaluate both the effectiveness and currency of the staff development plan in
order meet the guidelines of the technology plan, to comply with rigorous state
and district standards for subject matter content and technology, to align with
curricular goals, and to act on improvement plans.
CTAP2’s i-assessments will continually provide necessary data for tracking staff members’ technology skills, and how teachers are progressing on learning the tools and then applying the tools in their classrooms.
Sources (See Appendix A):
·
ACOT, 2003
·
CTAP2, 2003
·
Fullan, 1993
·
Joyce, 1995
·
McKenzie, 1993
·
McKenzie, 1999
·
Milken 2000
·
WestEd, 2003
Data from the District
Technology Survey:
Each of the school sites has
conducted staff surveys to assess staff competencies for the purposes of
developing
Current
staff proficiency based on CTAP2 averages at the intermediate level.
The following chart identifies the current strengths and weaknesses of the
EDUHSD staff’s technology proficiency:
(See Chart in Appendix B.) More data about teachers’ personal use of
technology is available online at http://www.ctap2.iassessment.org.
From this point forward, sites will
continue to use the CTAP2 i–assessment as
a district wide standard for monitoring staff technology competencies and the
use of technology to improve student learning.
The data collected through the use of the CTAP2 i–assessment will allow the District to provide more
relevant professional development opportunities as well as give the District
the ability to track improvement over time.
Goal 2.1:
Objective:
2.1.1
Based on the CTAP2
assessment, by June of 2005, 90% teachers, staff and administrators will have
at least a basic proficiency in the technology skills outlined by CTAP2
Benchmarks:
2.1.1a By June of 2004, 60% of teachers, staff and
administrators will reach a proficient level of competency in a majority of the
areas addressed by CTAP i-assessment.
2.1.1b By June of 2005, 75% of teachers, staff and
administrators will reach a proficient level of competency in a majority of the
areas addressed by CTAP i-assessment.
2.1.1c By June of 2006, 90% of teachers, staff and
administrators will reach a proficient level of competency in a majority of the
areas addressed by CTAP2 i-assessment.
Goal
#
|
Implementation Plan/Activities
|
Responsible Dept. or Position |
Timeline |
Budget Source* |
Monitoring and Evaluation
activities |
|
2.1 |
Implemented CTAP2
throughout the District. |
Site
Administration |
June 2003 -
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Periodic review of CTAP2 participation. |
|
2.1 |
Develop
workshops and materials to address staff needs. |
Site Technology
Administrators |
June 2004 - January
2005 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Professional
Learning workshop participation and availability reports. |
|
2.1 |
Implement all
applicable training models to address needs of staff as identified by CTAP2. |
Site Technology
Administrators |
January 2005 -
June 2005 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Information
compiled by the Profession Learning feed back form and sign-in sheets. |
|
2.1 |
Compare and
review CTAP2 data with baseline data. |
Site Technology
Administrators |
June 2005 -
September 2005 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Review of CTAP2
participation. |
|
2.1 |
Modify
applicable training models and material to address adjusted needs of staff as
identified by CTAP2. |
Site Technology
Administrators |
September 2005
- June 2006 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Professional Learning workshop
participation and availability reports. |
Sources (See Appendix A):
·
ACOT, 2003
·
Fullan, 1993
·
ISTE, 2000
·
Mann, et al, 1999
·
McKenzie, 1999
·
McKenzie, 2000
·
Milken, 2000
·
Roblyer, M. D., & Bennett, E. K.,
2001
·
Roschelle, J., & Pea, R., 1999
·
Roschelle, et al, 2000
·
WestEd, 2003
Benefits:
Teachers and administrators use computer and information
technologies to improve their roles in the educational process. Numerous research examples indicate that staff
development in the area of technology will make teachers more comfortable with,
and more likely to use, technology in the classroom. By providing on-going
training and continuing education based on individual needs both the teachers
and the District as a whole benefit in the following ways:
Teachers:
·
Are provided with the technology training they
need - when they need it.
·
Are able to optimize
their use of existing hardware and software.
·
Are able to best
utilize the technology available to improve student learning.
District:
·
Provides the appropriate and timely training to
its staff.
·
Adapts to the changing technological needs of a
growing District.
·
Makes better use of limited resources.
·
Makes better informed decisions about technology
acquisitions based on skills and training of the staff.
Goal 2.2: Professional
development opportunities will support software that complements District
adopted textbooks/curriculum.
Objective:
2.2.1 85% of core subject/classroom teachers will
learn the tools necessary to integrate appropriate software and technology into
the reading, writing, and /or mathematics foci.
Benchmarks:
2.2.1a By June of 2004, 55% core subject/classroom
teachers will learn the tools necessary to integrate appropriate software and
technology into the reading, writing, and /or
mathematics foci.
2.2.1b By June of 2005, 65% core subject/classroom
teachers will learn the tools necessary to integrate appropriate software and
technology into the reading, writing, and /or
mathematics foci.
2.2.1c By June of 2006, 75% core subject/classroom
teachers will learn the tools necessary to integrate appropriate software and
technology into the reading, writing, and /or
mathematics foci.
Goal
#
|
Implementation Plan/Activities
|
Responsible Dept. or Position |
Timeline |
Budget Source* |
Monitoring and Evaluation
activities |
|
2.2 |
Evaluate
available curriculum enhancing software. |
Department
Chairs |
June 2004 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Rank usability and functionalities of each. |
|
2.2 |
Facilitate Year
1 of District-wide administration of CTAP2’s Technology Use
Survey. |
Tech
Integration Site Admin |
June
2004-September 2004 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Review data from CTAP2’s Technology Use Survey . |
|
2.2 |
Create and
provide staff development workshops to promote tech integration skills
pertinent to approved software. |
Tech Integration |
June 2005 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Professional Learning catalog and feedback forms. |
|
2.2 |
Modify
workshops to address changes in the needs of the staff. |
Tech
Integration |
June 2006 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Professional Learning catalog and
feedback forms |
Sources (Appendix A):
· Cradler & Cradler, 1995
· Mann, et al, 1998
· McKenzie, 1999
· McKenzie, 2000
·
WestEd, 2003
Benefits:
Teachers are more likely to embrace technology if they can
see the connection between learning the tools and improved student
learning. The best way to enlist a much
larger percentage of teachers in the use of technology is to offer them a
combination of powerful tools along with technology-rich, standards-based model
lessons across the curriculum. Teachers
will integrate technology into their teaching when they are provided with:
·
Worthwhile classroom activities.
·
On-going staff development and support.
·
On-going assessment for tracking their personal growth
in effective use of technology.
Goal 2.3: Professional
Development opportunities will be provided in areas that will support classroom
management t (i.e. grade books, attendance, email) to support teachers’ efforts
to meet classroom and individual student academic needs.
Objectives:
2.3.1 By June 2006, teachers will consistently use various
applications, such as ABI, to track student attendance and grades.
2.3.2 By June 2006, all core curricular benchmarks
will be tracked electronically through AERIES.
Benchmarks:
2.3.1a By
June of 2004, 90% of teachers will use ABI to record daily attendance, progress
and quarterly grades.
2.3.1b By
June of 2005, 95% of teachers will use ABI to record daily attendance, progress
and quarterly grades.
2.3.1b By
June of 2006, 100% of teachers will use ABI to record daily attendance,
progress and quarterly grades.
2.3.2a By
June of 2004, Computer Technology 1 course competencies will be tracked
through AERIES for all students.
2.3.2b By June of 2005, Math course competencies will be tracked through AERIES for all students.
2.3.2c
By
June of 2005, English, Science and Social Science course competencies
will be tracked through AERIES for all students.
Objective
#
|
Implementation Plan/Activities
|
Responsible Dept. or Position |
Timeline |
Budget Source* |
Monitoring and Evaluation
activities |
|
2.3.1 |
Continue to
make available training on AERIES/ABI attendance and grade reporting features.
|
Site Admin |
June 2003 -
January 2004 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Professional learning catalog and feedback forms. |
|
2.3.2 |
Build a
database in AERIES to store results of student benchmarks in core subject
areas. |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2003-June
2004 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Completion of database |
|
2.3.2 |
Train teachers
to input benchmark data into an Excel file. |
Site Technology
Administrator |
June 2003-June
2006 |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Teacher submission of Excel files. |
|
2.3.2 |
Technician will
input data from Excel files into AERIES database. |
Microcomputer
Technicians |
June 2003-June
2006, each semester |
General Fund,
Other Categorical Funds |
Administrators analyze AERIES data to track benchmark
progression. |
Sources (See Appendix A):
· Geisert, 2000
· McKenzie, 1993
·
McKenzie, 1999
Benefits:
Accurate
record keeping is essential to both a well-run District and a well-run
classroom. An electronic student
information system is a key example of how technology can be used to increase
teacher productivity. When such
productivity tools are available to teachers, they are quickly and easily able
to: